In The Skeptical Environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg challenges widely held beliefs that the global environment is progressively getting worse. Using statistical. So the world isn’t doomed after all? Chris Lavers is himself sceptical about Bjørn Lomborg’s The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the. Bjorn Lomborg is a Danish author and political scientist, and President of the Copenhagen Consensus Centre. He’s best known for his
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||7 July 2010|
|PDF File Size:||2.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Much of the book’s methodology and integrity have been subject to criticism which argue that Lomborg distorted the fields of research he covers. The central point is that we need to weigh up the costs and benefits associated with solving a problem – say global warming – and that our money might be better off spent elsewhere.
He does bring up questions that I’d love to read more about.
Don’t spend trillions of dollars and not make a difference, plan wisely and save millions of lives. If the realities of today’s environmental crises paralyze you and you need to stick your head in the sand this book will go a long ways toward alleviating your worries and make you feel safe again.
This is a book about the environment, economics and management. As a partial solution, Lomborg presents fish farms, which cause a less disruptive impact on the world’s oceans. So, you know, going through this book is a good exercise to get you to think critically about your beliefs and about the environmental issues we face.
The Skeptical Environmentalist obviously should be held to high standards of accuracy, but to insist that it read like a scientific paper is both specious and disingenuous. The latest dire threat I hear about from alarmist types has to do with population, since more and more say man did not destroy the earth with climate change.
The Skeptical Environmentalist | Bjorn Lomborg
If you hear a “consensus” that the sky is falling, it does not make it so. Many of the extant reviews exist to further the agendae of the reviewers, rather than cast an unbiased however jaded eye over this book.
If you are an environmentalist, this is a must read – it shows what the “other side” can use as arguments against your cause. These are just scare stories put about by ideologues and promulgated by the media. I felt a little snowed, but I also raised my eyebrows at data that I simply didn’t know about. Measuring the Real State of the World. Slightly dated but a great book. Skepticxl sande tilstandliteral translation: Don’t just assume it and then build your argument on its relative costs.
However, Lomborg notes that Africa in particular gjorn produces too little sustenance, an effect he attributes to the continent’s dismal economic and political systems. But you can’t just send people food and clean water and expect that to fix their problems.
The treehuggers have a penchant for saying the message of The Skeptical Environmentalist is “nothing’s envitonmentalist a point which Lomborg specifically addresses many times, far more than he should have to, in this book. Lomborg, however, has come to see this as a shortsighted and highly detrimental approach, not to mention a condescending envidonmentalist.
The only way to dismiss Mr. I selected this book because I did judge the book by its cover. A short-term decline does not mean a long-term problem. The Skeptical Environmentalist challenges widely held beliefs that the environmental situation is getting worse and worse.
The Skeptical Environmentalist
No trivia or quizzes yet. Other readers did the same. Not surprisingly, the Union of Concerned Scientists, a political action group, completed a series of rebuttals environmentaoist this book.
Retrieved from ” https: Skeptical of the skeptical environmentalist. It was first published in Danish inwhile the Sieptical edition was published as a work in environmental economics by Cambridge University Press in Lomborg concludes that ‘being presented with skeptial real state of the world makes us realise that, given our past record, it is likely that by humanity’s bjon and collected efforts we can handle and find solutions to these problems.
Dec Okay, I am not really reading this again, and havent been for a few months. Bad compared to what? We’ve all heard bmorn main points many times: However, The Skeptical Environmentalist is methodologically eclectic and cross-disciplinary, combining interpretation of data with assessments of the media and human behavior, evaluations of scientific theories, and other approaches, to arrive at its various conclusions.
A Case Study in the Manufacture of News”,  attributes this media success to its initial, influential supporters:. Which, as you may surmise, makes for a book that is at time more boring than it is controversial.
He cites accepted mainstream sources, like the United States government, United Nations agencies and others, preferring global long-term data over regional and short-term statistics.